Kendal may need two new primary schools

KENDAL’s schools will be unable to cope if major housing proposals are given the green light, it emerged this week.

Two more primary schools will be needed to cater for 420 children from 1,961 new households in the town.

The revelation came at a public inquiry into whether South Lakeland Council’s land allocations document, identifying areas to accommodate 6,000 homes across the region by the year 2025, is ‘sound’.

Evidence gathered by Cumbria County Council, submitted to planning inspector Simon Berkeley, also predicted that secondary schools would be pushed above capacity – with 314 extra students seeking places.

Financial backing from developers would be ‘essential’ to deliver the infrastructure, including expanding schools, the CCC document stated.

Dennis Reed, who campaigned for a referendum on the housing plans, said: “Without funding and a plan for increased school places the council should not be going ahead with big developments in Kendal.

“Education is one of the major aspects where there are no implementation proposals. They have not thought it through.”

A document to go before the inquiry shows eight of Kendal’s nine primary schools are full and will remain so for four years.

Related links

One has some places available, but even building a new school would leave no spare capacity.

The potential lack of places was raised by Mr Berkeley on the opening day of the inquiry, when he urged both councils to talk about it so they could answer his questions later.

School leaders are con-fident there is sufficient time to account for extra numbers – however, one head said he wanted to defend his school’s ‘character’.

Phil Hyman, of Kirkbie Kendal, said the school had room for a further 150 pupils, which would take the total to 1,100.

“That’s the sort of number we would be able to take in our buildings, if we were to maintain our distinctive character,” said Mr Hyman.

“Kendal has two nice secondary schools and it gives people choice. If we made the two schools the same, it could taint things.”

Mr Hyman added while he did not want the school to grow too large, it would work with planners to provide an ‘appropriate’ number of extra classes if it became clear further capacity was needed.

Westmorland and Lonsdale MP Tim Farron said he would prefer to see schools outside Kendal filled to capacity and then extended before any new ones were built.

“Most schools outside Kendal aren’t full and could take on extra pupils and would delighted for the opportunity to be able to do so,” said Mr Farron.

“There are smaller schools with fewer than 60 pupils which are always on a knife edge and need more kids – additional numbers would help them."

Enid Fraser, executive officer at South Lakes Federation of Schools, said she thought schools would have enough time to prepare for more children.

She said: “Homes aren’t built overnight. I don’t feel it is a major problem bec-ause schools do grow.

“Some areas of the country get influxes and they’re suddenly trying to manage places for hundreds of children, but this isn’t that.”

Dan Hudson, SLDC’s development strategy manager, said the authority was working closely with CCC to ‘appropriately meet educational needs’.

Comments(10)

doodleshire14 says...
9:17am Fri 26 Oct 12

Why is this item being reported as though it is a problem. New schools will mean new jobs as well as new amenities for the wider communities - all sounds good to me.

boris plasticmac says...
10:17am Fri 26 Oct 12

Providing new schools is not the problem but the fact that the LDP has made no provision as to where they are going and how they will be paid for is.
Vague statements about developers providing finance need to be clarified and they must be overjoyed at having to find another million or two before their project gets off the ground.
The idea from Mr Farron that the overspill can be taken care of by bussing children to outlying schools is ludicrous and will add to a school run traffic problem which is already out of hand .
The over subscription of Kendal Schools has been known since the the LPD was first envisaged and is example of a lack of joined up thinking that occurs throughout this flawed plan .

JBean2 says...
8:36pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Not so long ago the Gazette reported that some rural schools were under threat of closure. Then, this week we are told that a possible closure threat hanging over dozens of Cumbria’s schools appears to have been lifted.

But it is well known that the number of school age children in Cumbria is falling, and looks set to do so for some time. So I would think there will be spare capacity in a number of schools and also that some schools would be able and very willing to expand.
Why does the Gazette come out with such a provocative headline that Kendal may need two new primary schools?

Also, who is the person who has declared these figures of 420 extra children from 1,961 new houses? How do they know?
All these houses will not appear at once, over night. A lot of the people who will buy them, particularly affordable or social housing will already be living locally anyway. They are not extra people, they may be currently living with parents or in rented accommodation, they may be retired and wish to downsize.

I think it would be a very good thing anyway, if the proportion of young people increased in Cumbria, as it is now an aging population. I totally agree with doodleshire14. Why is this seen as a problem?

boris plasticmac says...
9:39pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Sorry JBean2 but the problem that is that the spare school capacity is in the wrong place. The developments planned are in Kendal, where there is little if any spare space in the schools. The figures for the increase of primary school children have been provided by Cumbria County Council .
So common sense says you plan early to prevent future overcrowding either by proposing new school sites in Kendal or extending existing ones.
Solving the small rural school problem using Kendal overspill is a non starter.

JBean2 says...
1:41am Sun 28 Oct 12

Well I will be very interested to see if two new schools are built in Kendal or if the existing schools just absorb any increase in children. As I said, the number of school age children is falling in South Lakeland. Primary schools actively market themselves in an attempt to get their intake numbers up.

I feel this is just scare-mongering by those people opposed to new housing. Would they rather see a decline in children in our schools? And I know there are quite a few families in Kendal who choose to send their children to surrounding village schools and those schools are very grateful for this. So this idea is not a non-starter!
If you grew up in a village but can't afford to buy a house there, because retired people have moved in or second home owners have taken over, you may well buy a house in Kendal but choose to send your children to the village school.

The point is though, that we need more housing for people who are already in the local area not for extra people. Some of these people may be going to have children anyway. If they can move in to a house of their own in Kendal , this can only be a good thing surely.

boris plasticmac says...
11:54am Sun 28 Oct 12

I am not sure it's scare-mongering to ask how the increase in numbers of primary school age children, which will be a consequence of this plan, can be accommodated into the system.
Village schools can provide a fantastic education reflecting the local community. If you start bulking out these schools with children from outside the immediate community, you're going to change the whole ethos of village schools as well as filling up the country side with even more cars.
So let's have some proper planning which takes into account consequences of decisions made.

JBean2 says...
9:17pm Sun 28 Oct 12

"Bulking out these schools with children from outside the immediate community"?

I would think any child attending a primary school would be considered a very important part of that community, regardless of where they live! If you are suggesting that only children living in a village should go to that school, then you are threatening the survival of most village schools.

This article is not simply asking a question. It is stating that two new primary schools will be needed as a result of the land allocations document. This is not a fact, it is speculation.

boris plasticmac says...
12:13am Mon 29 Oct 12

Just to help move this discussion on ,it might be helpful if you had a look at the Cumbria County Council document which deals with the education impacts of the LDP document. You can find it in SLDC's LDP document library EX027A dated 12th Sept.
The problems we're having with village schools are arising because other issues- funding formulae - second homes- the ageing demographics of rural areas, as well as the reluctance of the National Park to encourage affordable houses in their area.
Whatever happens there is likely to be some tough decisions taken in order to balance the education requirements of both town and country in the next few years, so we should plan accordingly .

Desdan says...
8:12pm Tue 30 Oct 12

Calm down Boris, we don't need any new schools, unless there is an hidden agenda?? The standard of teaching should be addressed before anything else. The only people having children these days are those on benefits, because noone else can afford to with the state the economy is in. Hard hitting facts i'm afraid. Are China joining the EEC so we have to accommodate all the families and children. Is that why we need an extra 2,000 homes??

in despair says...
5:09pm Wed 31 Oct 12

What a clown our MP is - hasnt he heard about the concept of sustainability.

This report just demonstrates - yet again - how poorly the LibDems have undertaken this Kendal expansion proposal

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree