Cumbria Tourism to say 'no' to nuclear dump - but only if it enters the Lake District National Park (From The Westmorland Gazette)
When news happens, text KENEWS and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Cumbria Tourism to say 'no' to nuclear dump - but only if it enters the Lake District National Park
12:12pm Monday 21st January 2013 in News
Eric Robson (left) with the late Alfred Wainwright
THE lead body for tourism in Cumbria will object to a vast underground nuclear repository for the county if it encroaches inside Lake District National Park territory, it has said.
Cumbria Tourism has explained its position of ‘neutrality’ in a letter to leading politician Baroness Verma of Leicester; whose portfolio at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, includes the issue.
The board’s statement, written by chairman, Eric Robson, comes ahead of a key vote next week involving Cumbria County Council, Allerdale and Copeland councils on January 30.
Cumbria Tourism represents more than 3,000 tourism businesses in the £2-billion a year tourism industry - the bulk of which are within the area designated national park.
Some in the county’s tourism industry are sufficiently concerned to already be actively campaigning against what protestors call an underground 'nuclear dump.'
They estimate it would be ‘deeper than Scafell is high, and bigger than the City of Carlisle’.
The Keswick-based Lake District Hotels group, run by hoteliers Kit and Charles Graves, are among the high profile tourism operators calling on Cumbria’s withdrawal from the process.
At the weekend, protestors from Radiation Free South Lakeland held a ‘Ditch The Dump’ rally in Bowness with organisers saying it attracted over 100 people who signed a giant postcard destined for Coun Eddie Martin, the leader of Cumbria County Council.
However, Eric Robson, chairman of Cumbria Tourism, said in its letter to the Baroness that the issue of nuclear waste is a ‘problem which needs to be addressed.’
"The executive board of Cumbria Tourism wishes to make clear that taking a neutral stance (at this stage) does not imply tacit support for a nuclear waste repository," wrote Mr Robson.
He said that there were no current definitive plans to ‘suggest it might be built in the Lake District National Park or the Solway Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty,’ as opposition groups have maintained.
However, he added: “It is inevitable that Cumbria Tourism would object strongly should further research lead to any suggestion that a nuclear waste repository could be considered in either the National Park or AONB.”
Marianne Birkby, of Radiation Free Lakeland, described Cumbria Tourism’s position as ‘weak kneed acquiescence.'
She also said the organisation and a recent statement by the Friends of the Lake District on the issue was tantamount to: ‘Playing to an increasingly angry gallery but not doing the right thing and opposing.’
The Friends, a conservation charity group, have written to councillors on CCC requesting they reject the chance to remain in the search for a potential site.
The Friends said their approach would be 'further geological desk-based analysis, together with related hydrological conditions, being conducted independently and openly, involving a wide range of interest groups and public representatives before progressing any further towards site selection.
Jack Ellerby, policy officer at FoLD said: “Public anxiety, by a wide range of interests and communities potentially affected, about the neutrality of the decision making process associated with the MRWS (Managing Radioactive Waste Safely) process is growing.
“The process has lost the trust of the people and businesses of Cumbria. Suitable geology to host any underground repository is key to the whole process to ensure a safe, secure and technical facility."
“The evidence we’ve seen shows the potential is low in the mudstones on the Solway and the Eskdale granites. In the interests of Cumbria’s economy and environment as a whole, land in or under the Lake District National Park and the Solway Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, should be taken out of the equation in any case.”
Comments(9)
hemyfan
says...
10:45pm Mon 21 Jan 13
twitchy
says...
12:46am Tue 22 Jan 13
It doesn't matter how many tests. bore holes and consultations are conducted, it will not change the geology of the area under consideration, it was deemed unsuitable in the 90s and it is unsuitable now.
We need a positive, definite, NO, NOT HERE NOT EVER.
Then residents and businesses who have invested heavily in the National Park on the understanding that the area will be PROTECTED can breath a sigh of relief.
Those looking to have a repository in Cumbria will exploit any sign of reticence.
Moonbase
says...
5:19am Tue 22 Jan 13
It's like a Ghost Town.
If it was not for the japs comming, god knows what it would be like.
It's time for some radical thinking and bringing back speed boating back to Windermere and breathing a bit of life into the Lakes.
I agree with 'Twitcy's' comments but unfortunately this is a perfect opportunity for the usual fat cat gravey train to rumble on and on.....expenses,expe
nses and funny handshake heaven.
Pesimist no, just realist.
No to the Dump and Yes to getting rid of old bad wood.
magical trevor
says...
8:04am Tue 22 Jan 13
marianneb
says...
3:56pm Tue 22 Jan 13
magical trevor
says...
5:13pm Tue 22 Jan 13
nor is it mine....but unhelpful statements using words such as 'toxic', and 'dump' immediately show the childish way in which many people are viewing this matter. I know you won't like me having an opinion on the matter and on what you've said...but hey ho, I'm not subject to your whims.
debs2k
says...
9:21pm Tue 22 Jan 13
Moonbase
says...
10:42pm Tue 22 Jan 13
magical trevor wrote:Great ship ,would that be the the 'Titanic`?
Moonbase seems to think that every time something crops up with a slight hint of drama, it should be used to 'get rid of old bad wood' as she\he puts it. There are bigger issues at stake here, than your perceived grudges against those in command of the great ship that is Cumbria.
Milkbutnosugarplease says...
12:51pm Mon 21 Jan 13