No U-turn over nuclear waste rejection as CCC leader slams critics and reveals he won't stand for re-election

The Westmorland Gazette: Eddie Martin Eddie Martin

THE leader of Cumbria County Council today robustly defended the decision to rule the county out of a search to find a home for an underground nuclear waste repository.

Cllr Eddie Martin rejected claims his Conservative-dominated Cabinet bowed to pressure, and denied he had threatened to quit unless fellow Tories backed him in the vote.

Cllr Martin also told today’s meeting that the county council had a poor relationship with government and called on the county’s nuclear industry to contribute more money to solving west Cumbria’s social problems.

Last month’s no vote was being re-examined by a special scrutiny committee today after the authority’s ruling cabinet voted 7 to 3 to withdraw Cumbria.

Revealing publically for the first time that he does not intend to stand for re-election in May, Cllr Martin denied claims the decision had soured Whitehall relations.

“What relationship?” asked Cllr Martin. “We don’t have a relationship with Government. I go down there; I’ve written to and met with several government ministers and departments. Not once have we had a positive response.”

The meeting was told by a west Cumbria Labour councillor that Cumbria County Council is now regarded as a ‘spent force’ in Whitehall, as a result of the decision.

Since the vote last month, senior Labour councillor and former Sellafield employee, Tim Knowles quit his role on the county council cabinet in protest.

However, having heard from all sides in the debate, the 11-members of CCC’s Scrutiny Advisory Board unanimously agreed the original decision should stand.

Members had heard from three west Cumbria councillors who were behind the decision being ‘called in’ for closer examination.

One of the councillors, David Southward, told the meeting: “I know of no coherent reason why Cabinet took the decision it did.”

He said conditions and safeguards to overcome concerns should have been added, rather than totally withdrawing the county from the process.

“This has rendered Cumbria County Council a spent force in Government,” said Cllr Southward. “This is one last chance to rectify a colossal blunder. Please take it.”

Referring to the benefits package a ‘host’ community would have received, Cllr Southward said it would have ‘revitalised the economy of Copeland and Cumbria’ but was dependent on the ‘GDF ball remaining in play.’ In his response, Cllr Martin said: “This particular issue is not Copeland specific. It affects the whole of Cumbria and my responsibility is to the people of Cumbria, not Westminster. I’m not beholden to Westminster or David Cameron. The people of Cumbria elected me, not David Cameron.”

He explained the no vote was due to the ‘cumulative effect’ of a number of unanswered questions, and a failure to get proper reassurances from the government.

One of these concerned whether the county had a legal ‘get out’ clause if it agreed to take part in stage four of the process.

The government’s answer to this question had been analysed by county council lawyers, and then external barristers, said Cllr Martin.

Their conclusions were that while Cumbria could have “a legitimate expectation,’ to withdraw, it was not legally set in stone.

Calls by Cumbria to have the right of withdrawal made legally-binding by the government were also given vague answers, said Cllr Martin.

He suggested that not once had Cumbria been told the precise amount of money the county could expect as benefits package, Cllr Martin explained Energy Minister Ed Davey ‘did not have the authority’ to agree figures, and that it also required Treasury backing which was not apparent.

Cllr Martin said his position was: “If you want us to store the nation’s nuclear waste, Mr Government, for ever and ever and ever in perpetuity, it will cost you. There will be a price to pay. No price was ever forthcoming and we raised it time and time again. All we were promised was half-a-million for Lake District branding.”

Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Southward said it was important that the scrutiny committee had been given the chance to test the decision with fresh eyes.

Cllr Southward believes the likelihood of an underground nuclear waste store for Cumbria is now over ‘unless the government imposes it.’ Anti-nuclear campaigner, Ron Stirzaker, from Bowness, who turns 78 tomorrow, was among those demonstrating outside The Courts in Carlisle Mr Stirzaker described today’s ruling that the council upholds the original decision as ‘the best present’.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:26pm Tue 19 Feb 13

BLACKSAIL says...

Victory for Cumbria and common sense.
Victory for Cumbria and common sense. BLACKSAIL

3:45pm Wed 20 Feb 13

onelocal says...

Might not be such a victory when there are no jobs and no investment in West Cumbria, the submarine building in Barrow has gone and there are tons of nuclear waste stored in rusting sheds at a long gone Sellafield. When we are talking thousands of years storage, this short term decision might come back to haunt our descendants.
Might not be such a victory when there are no jobs and no investment in West Cumbria, the submarine building in Barrow has gone and there are tons of nuclear waste stored in rusting sheds at a long gone Sellafield. When we are talking thousands of years storage, this short term decision might come back to haunt our descendants. onelocal

6:47pm Wed 20 Feb 13

twitchy says...

Ruled out in Cumbria but not ruled out in the UK or abroad. It would certainly haunt our descendants if it was stored in the wrong geology.
The lack of investment in West Cumbria is most likely because of Sellafield and its dire history of bad management and leaks.
I happen to think that West Cumbria is an attractive location, but like most people I wouldn't go there because of Sellafield and the contamination on its beaches.
Ruled out in Cumbria but not ruled out in the UK or abroad. It would certainly haunt our descendants if it was stored in the wrong geology. The lack of investment in West Cumbria is most likely because of Sellafield and its dire history of bad management and leaks. I happen to think that West Cumbria is an attractive location, but like most people I wouldn't go there because of Sellafield and the contamination on its beaches. twitchy

8:36pm Wed 20 Feb 13

onelocal says...

Abroad, LOL! Dream on.
In the UK? I'm afraid "Made in Cumbria" really means what it says. If no one else will take it, and they are not exactly queueing up, then it will stay in Cumbria. Better it be buried underground in a well designed, well managed depository, then your descendants can enjoy the beaches of West Cumbria in safety in a thousand years time.
Abroad, LOL! Dream on. In the UK? I'm afraid "Made in Cumbria" really means what it says. If no one else will take it, and they are not exactly queueing up, then it will stay in Cumbria. Better it be buried underground in a well designed, well managed depository, then your descendants can enjoy the beaches of West Cumbria in safety in a thousand years time. onelocal

9:14am Thu 21 Feb 13

marianneb says...

Many Thanks to Cumbria's Cabinet and Eddie Martin for calling a halt to the insane plan to put high level waste under Cumbria. Now we can concentrate on securing the safety of the waste on the Sellafield site. First step to containing the waste is to stop making more deadly plutonium, stop reprocessing and call a halt to dispersal of wastes to landfill, to deliberate evaporation of wastes to air, to melting down of radioactive scrap metal into pots and pans, to discharge into our rivers and our sea. "clean up" of Sellafield currently means dispersal to the wider environment, clean up should mean all money and expertise is put into containment.
Many Thanks to Cumbria's Cabinet and Eddie Martin for calling a halt to the insane plan to put high level waste under Cumbria. Now we can concentrate on securing the safety of the waste on the Sellafield site. First step to containing the waste is to stop making more deadly plutonium, stop reprocessing and call a halt to dispersal of wastes to landfill, to deliberate evaporation of wastes to air, to melting down of radioactive scrap metal into pots and pans, to discharge into our rivers and our sea. "clean up" of Sellafield currently means dispersal to the wider environment, clean up should mean all money and expertise is put into containment. marianneb

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree