Jobs threat at Lake District National Park Authority - but park chief says all services will be protected

Jobs threat at Lake District National Park Authority - but park chief says all services will be protected

Jobs threat at Lake District National Park Authority - but park chief says all services will be protected

First published in News The Westmorland Gazette: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

JOBS are at risk at the Lake District National Park Authority as it grapples with further cuts and reductions to its annual grant.

Bosses at its Murley Moss headquarters are in a 45-day consultation with the 200-strong workforce on a new restructure.

Park officials say they are determined to avoid compulsory losses and a voluntary redundancy programme has opened.

Chief executive Richard Leafe expects job losses to be ‘very minimal’ but said he could not give figures until the consultation is over.

The park is looking to reduce its running costs including its £5million annual wage bill and may now sell off some of its £13million estate.

Since the coalition’s austerity drive came in, the park has had to absorb and prepare for its annual grant being reduced from £7.2million in 2010, to what will be £5.2million by 2016 – a 28 percent cut.

A source claimed staff were facing downgrades and posts being reduced to part-time with morale reported to be ‘very low’.

But Mr Leafe insisted: “The National Park Authority is going to be a very positive place to work in the future because we have an agenda and a mission to look after and transform the national park for the future and we are committed to carrying that on.”

MORE TOP STORIES:

It is feared that at its three information centres in Bowness, Keswick and UIlswater, zero hours contracts could be brought in and a loss of unsocial working allowances. Mr Leafe declined to address these claims, saying he would not carry out ‘consultation via the media’.

The authority has pared down its top team of directors from four to three and reiterated its restructure plans are ‘proposals not decisions’. It is waiting on staff and union feedback before any ideas are implemented or scrapped.

A park spokeswoman confirmed external HR consultants had been employed to ‘assist’ in the restructure. The spokesman added that their fees - described as ‘huge’ by a source - is not additional spend as they would be met from existing money in HR budgets.

Mr Leafe said the cost of the consultants was ‘nominal’ and maintained all of its services were being protected - no toilets would close, Brockhole was safe, its information centres secure and Coniston Boating Centre would remain.

The park spokesman said a clearer picture of the park’s future would emerge by mid-June when the consultation was over.

A statement read: “We are committed to avoiding the need for compulsory redundancy and recognise this is an uncertain time for our staff. The authority is seeking to achieve savings to protect services and to bring financial stability to the organisation for the next few years.”

An anonymous letter to the Gazette said staff feared ‘challenging proposals,’ and that the restructure contained ‘big gaps’.

In recent years, the authority has repositioned its focus to become more commercial. Targets are in place to increase commercial income every year although papers from the park’s last Resources Committee, which sat in November, carried a warning that some managers in some areas were ‘struggling to meet’ the 2013-14 target.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:07am Thu 8 May 14

tourer says...

The national park authority is a huge unnecessary, dinosaur which is too controlling and needs to be gradually fazed out ,so maybe this is the start, but they need to prune the staff at the ivory tower of murley moss first and move on, ..
The national park authority is a huge unnecessary, dinosaur which is too controlling and needs to be gradually fazed out ,so maybe this is the start, but they need to prune the staff at the ivory tower of murley moss first and move on, .. tourer
  • Score: 8

1:22pm Fri 9 May 14

Lakesbloke says...

I’ve always wondered how the Lake District National Park Authority can truly be seen as being responsible for the Lake District when its HQ is actually outside the National Park, I doubt other UK National Parks are in this position. There is a perfectly good building at Brockhole which could be used for the majority of offices. I shudder to think what the lease on Murley Moss must cost, but they own Brockhole.
Maybe it’s time they went back to first principles and dealt with their basic statutory duties and rebuilt from there, all this poncing about with The Adventure Capital, and World Heritage Site stuff is an unnecessary diversion which costs a lot of money. Don’t get me started on GoLakes Travel – all a good idea but not carried out in any way with the communities involved being consulted and partnered.
They may have not shut any Loos, but their now starting to charge 20p a go…which hits tourists, locals everyone, and along with the farcical car parking with ANPR puts everyone off coming back or even visiting different parts of their own area. History may show all of this to be silent sabotage in the long run.
I’ve always wondered how the Lake District National Park Authority can truly be seen as being responsible for the Lake District when its HQ is actually outside the National Park, I doubt other UK National Parks are in this position. There is a perfectly good building at Brockhole which could be used for the majority of offices. I shudder to think what the lease on Murley Moss must cost, but they own Brockhole. Maybe it’s time they went back to first principles and dealt with their basic statutory duties and rebuilt from there, all this poncing about with The Adventure Capital, and World Heritage Site stuff is an unnecessary diversion which costs a lot of money. Don’t get me started on GoLakes Travel – all a good idea but not carried out in any way with the communities involved being consulted and partnered. They may have not shut any Loos, but their now starting to charge 20p a go…which hits tourists, locals everyone, and along with the farcical car parking with ANPR puts everyone off coming back or even visiting different parts of their own area. History may show all of this to be silent sabotage in the long run. Lakesbloke
  • Score: 5

1:53pm Wed 14 May 14

Herdygirl says...

Lakesbloke wrote:
I’ve always wondered how the Lake District National Park Authority can truly be seen as being responsible for the Lake District when its HQ is actually outside the National Park, I doubt other UK National Parks are in this position. There is a perfectly good building at Brockhole which could be used for the majority of offices. I shudder to think what the lease on Murley Moss must cost, but they own Brockhole.
Maybe it’s time they went back to first principles and dealt with their basic statutory duties and rebuilt from there, all this poncing about with The Adventure Capital, and World Heritage Site stuff is an unnecessary diversion which costs a lot of money. Don’t get me started on GoLakes Travel – all a good idea but not carried out in any way with the communities involved being consulted and partnered.
They may have not shut any Loos, but their now starting to charge 20p a go…which hits tourists, locals everyone, and along with the farcical car parking with ANPR puts everyone off coming back or even visiting different parts of their own area. History may show all of this to be silent sabotage in the long run.
A lot, if not the majority, of National Parks have their offices just outside the National Park borders, this is where offices are cheaper, enabling them to preserve services elsewhere.
[quote][p][bold]Lakesbloke[/bold] wrote: I’ve always wondered how the Lake District National Park Authority can truly be seen as being responsible for the Lake District when its HQ is actually outside the National Park, I doubt other UK National Parks are in this position. There is a perfectly good building at Brockhole which could be used for the majority of offices. I shudder to think what the lease on Murley Moss must cost, but they own Brockhole. Maybe it’s time they went back to first principles and dealt with their basic statutory duties and rebuilt from there, all this poncing about with The Adventure Capital, and World Heritage Site stuff is an unnecessary diversion which costs a lot of money. Don’t get me started on GoLakes Travel – all a good idea but not carried out in any way with the communities involved being consulted and partnered. They may have not shut any Loos, but their now starting to charge 20p a go…which hits tourists, locals everyone, and along with the farcical car parking with ANPR puts everyone off coming back or even visiting different parts of their own area. History may show all of this to be silent sabotage in the long run.[/p][/quote]A lot, if not the majority, of National Parks have their offices just outside the National Park borders, this is where offices are cheaper, enabling them to preserve services elsewhere. Herdygirl
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree