When news happens, text KENEWS and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
2:30pm Wednesday 11th January 2012 in News
By Steven Bell, Reporter
LAKE District tourism organisations are backing calls to move the clocks forward one hour to boost business.
They believe lighter evenings would allow attractions to stay open longer, extend the tourism season and help the economy.
MPs will vote on the Daylight Saving Bill – which calls for a review of the pros and cons of shifting time forward by an hour for all or part of the year – on January 20.
Cumbria Tourism and Windermere Lake Cruises have both signed up to the Lighter Later campaign, a national ‘coalition’ of road safety chiefs, businesses, environmentalists, health experts and charities.
“In these times of financial constraints, from our perspective, no other zero-cost change would bring as much economic benefit as a change to daylight saving,” said Nigel Wilkinson, chief executive of Windermere Lake Cruises.
And according to Richard Greenwood, head of policy and research at Cumbria Tourism: “The extra daylight hours that the bill would 'create' will most certainly have the spin off of extending the day for visitors and allowing more time outdoors.
“It should make Cumbria more competitive, increase visitor spending and sustain jobs in the industry.”
Both men have signed a letter to MPs from groups across northern England which says: “We have two of the UK’s most beautiful national parks on our doorstep. Giving ourselves and others more time to enjoy them would bring both health and economic benefits to the region.
“Tourism provides 32,000 jobs in Cumbria alone, and brings knock-on benefits to many businesses.”
The letter says the review of time changes will make ‘a persuasive case for change to an outdated status quo.’ It concludes: “Given the economic, environmental and health benefits change could bring, the time is surely right to reconsider clock settings.”
Road safety campaigners also back the review, saying there are more accidents during afternoons and evenings and the change would save lives.
And climate change activists say decreased use of lighting would help to save energy.
What do you think? Vote on our online web poll
Comments(8)
K L Potter
says...
8:54am Fri 13 Jan 12
life cycle too
says...
3:04am Sun 15 Jan 12
TwoHat
says...
1:49pm Sun 15 Jan 12
a.b.oatman
says...
7:18pm Sun 15 Jan 12
TwoHat wrote:You are not disappointing anyone, just completely missing the point.
I'm sorry to disappoint you all, but you won't gain any extra daylight by doing this. This is governed by the movement of the earth around our sun. Tinkering like this is similar to cutting a bit off the bottom of the ladder and sticking it on the top to make it taller.
If you want more daylight in the evenings, just get up earlier. If you want to trade with customers in different timezones then you will just have to open during their daytime. There is no need to throw the clock time out of sync with the time dictated by the sun in order to achieve this.
revjon
says...
8:53am Mon 16 Jan 12
ccollier
says...
11:38am Mon 16 Jan 12
TwoHat
says...
6:28pm Mon 16 Jan 12
ccollier wrote:Well I wouldn't - I'd rather have GMT and adjust my bedtime to suit what light there is. Perhaps we should have a referendum on the issue?
There are health benefits too. As soon as evenings get dark it's much harder to play or exercise outdoors, so neither children nor adults are able to do as much without resorting to more expensive indoor activities. I'd rather have dark mornings and lighter evenings any day, so please get your vote in Mr Farron.
Career kick start
Search Now »
Find someone special
Search Now »
Home Sweet Home
Search Now »
Wheels and more
Search Now »
paul.holdsworth says...
4:20pm Wed 11 Jan 12