News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Meeting to be called to address Kendal 'A' board concerns'

SOUTH Lakeland District Council cabinet member Ian Stewart has called a meeting to address Kendal traders’ ‘A’-board concerns.

Local businesses have protested after receiving letters advising them that their advertising boards could not be displayed on the pavement.

The clampdown was agreed by councillors after the director of charity Sight South Lakeland, Carl Hodge, claimed the boards were preventing visually-impaired people from getting around South Lakeland towns.

Coun Ian Stewart, cabinet member for Economy and Enterprise, met yesterday with Westmorland and Lonsdale MP Tim Farron to discuss the potential effects removing advertising boards could have on Kendal’s businesses. He will be writing to the affected traders next week to invite them to a meeting with the council’s economic development team.

Coun Stewart said: "The vibrancy that our retailers bring to Kendal is great, and the resiliance of traders in tough economic times is praiseworthy. By working together, we can make sure that a solution is found which recognises the needs of those who need a clear and unobstructed pathway, and also the need for the vibrancy in Kendal to remain."

Comments(7)

Helvellyn55 says...
3:48pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Tim Farron courting votes again?

It is complete nonsense to suggest the vibrancy of Kendal will be damaged by the removal of trip hazards. Traders are fixate that they MUST have these things whereas an attractive window display is more effective at securing passing trade. Shoppers are not stupid and do look at the businesses they walk by - motorists should be paying heed to the road and any possible dangers and certaunly not checking A Boards so if any suggests that they should be looking at those A boards....

BentheBorderCollie says...
4:04pm Fri 3 Feb 12

I have some sympathies for traders who suffer from Kendal's historic street layout. Visitors have no idea what interesting shops are hiding in the "yards" - I've even had people stop me and ask where M&S is.

Shops in yards do need better signposting - it shouldn't be beyond the wit of designers to come up with something that works and which fits in with the streetscape of the town.

Utter says...
4:06pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Well done Tim - people thought it was an issue (see the previous gazette comments...) and he stepped in and made the council sort it out. Sounds good to me!

Kentish Man says...
10:45pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Other pedestrian hazards which could be tackled but I don't suppose will be as the council is responsible for them.
Litter Bins
Flower Troughs
Goods Displayed on pavement
Bus Stops
Pillar Boxes
Electricity junction boxes
Premises with scaffolding
Bollards

davidearnshaw says...
11:05pm Fri 3 Feb 12

Kendal Traders need all the help they can get in these hard economic times -- especially those with their premises, otherwise unseen down the historic "yards" --- "A" Boards placed carefully and sensibly -- possibly alongside the street wall are surely no different to the rest of the pavement ----- some of it unececcessary --- and street clutter that abounds --- decorative bollards, lamp posts, various flower / plant containers, steps up / down, cobbles, seats, waste bins, Post Boxes etc, etc.
The visually impaired are usually very skilled in finding their way through streets, and around the many obstacles, including other people rushing about the streets, without injury and I feel that Mr Hodge of the "Sight South Lakeland" has been ill advised that these boards are more of a hazard than any of the other items mentioned above. I hope that a compromise can be reached before yet another restrictive and penalising blow is dished out to the Kendal Traders.

KTJane says...
3:24pm Sat 4 Feb 12

I agree above. It's all very well suggesting that traders just get better window displays. Tucked down a yard, you need to be able to indicate that you are there in the first place to see said display. I think once again there are a few people who have not considered the placement of their A board and now we have something to moan about. Not all shops create hazards, therefore surely the council should just monitor the situation and remove ones that cause a problem??

I am quite sure that traders who have made comments are not suggesting all the recession issues are solved by a simple A board. But seeing as these businesses provide local employment and a decent town for us to live in, i think we all need to chill out a bit.

tictoc1 says...
2:39pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Kentish Man wrote:
Other pedestrian hazards which could be tackled but I don't suppose will be as the council is responsible for them. Litter Bins Flower Troughs Goods Displayed on pavement Bus Stops Pillar Boxes Electricity junction boxes Premises with scaffolding Bollards
My thoughts exactly! But what I find worse than all of these put together....trying to get out of the shopping centre, especially on a Saturday, opposite Boots and Next! What a stupid place to put bus stops! It's hard enough for the average person, let alone someone visually impared, or a family or person with a pushchair!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree