Hundreds of vehicles stopped in multi-agency crackdown on Cumbria's roads

MORE than 300 vehicles were stopped in a police operation to crack down on criminals on Thursday.

High visibility ‘Operation Acrobat’ involved several agencies, including 75 uniformed and plain-clothed Cumbria Police officers with the aim of deterring and detecting all kinds of criminality.

Three people from Aberdeen and Liverpool were arrested for disqualified driving, possession of controlled drugs, money laundering, being concerned in the supply of controlled drugs and police obstruction.

Six vehicles were seized for the driver having no insurance or driving licence, two vehicles were seized for being used in crime and several vehicles and their occupants searched and given fixed penalty notices for offences ranging from having no insurance to police obstruction.

HM Customs & Excise checked more than 150 vehicles for red diesel but all were found to be in order.

And several people were checked by the UK Border Agency regarding potential immigration offences but no wrong-doing was found.

Led by the Roads Policing Unit, the operation involved Cumbria Police’s Tactical Support Group, dog section, CID, local officers and Special Constables from every area of the force.

The operation was conducted on several static sites across the whole county.

Chief Inspector Kevin Greenhow, in overall charge of the operation, said: “This is a positive indication that these type of operations are having an impact as, on previous operations, numerous vehicles have been seized for red diesel offences.

“The penalties are extremely high and the continuing threat of being caught is clearly making people think twice before trying to avoid paying fuel duty.”

The Department of Work & Pensions Fraud Investigation Teams also made checks on individuals suspected of claiming benefits while working.

The Vehicle Operator Service Agency prohibited ten vehicles for a variety of offences, including a HGV driver behind the wheel an ‘excessive’ number of hours, defective tyres and a severely overweight goods vehicle – all of which have the potential to be the cause of a serious or fatal collision, police said.

Trading Standards officers dealt with issues relating to rogue traders and others focused on animal health – ensuring correct documentation and transportation regulations were adhered to.

Both sides of the Trading Standards Enforcement Team reported that the day had been a valuable intelligence gathering opportunity which will contribute to the prevention and detection of offences.

As the operation moved into the evening phase, Cumbria Police's Wildlife Crime Officers were joined by local gamekeepers and poacher-watch volunteers together with the Forestry Commission, Environment Agency and National Trust, to conduct poaching patrols of the rural parts of the county.

These patrols are part of ongoing work with rural communities to tackle poaching offences and other wildlife crime and are conducted in both marked and unmarked vehicles.

The multi-agency collaboration aims to protect rural businesses and communities, together with wildlife and environmental protection issues.

Chief Inspector Kevin Greenhow added: “Although in the bigger picture, Cumbria remains an extremely safe place to live, work and enjoy, there are certain individuals whose criminal activities impinge on the quality of life in our county.”

Comments(19)

Geoff103 says...
5:21pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Hmmm.

I'm not at all impressed by this sort of thing.

The authorities trumpet the number of wrong-doers caught but say little or nothing about the hundreds of perfectly ordinary and innocent people inconvenienced. Even assumed to be guilty and required to show their innocence as in "HM Customs & Excise checked more than 150 vehicles for red diesel but all were found to be in order."

In a free society we ought to be free to go about our business, free of suspicion and free from being subject to any kind of 'stop and check' operation.

But, as I wrote earlier on another comment thread this is yet another sign of how we, the general public, are treated by serfs by those with power and authority.

And it's a disgrace.

Geoff103 says...
5:22pm Fri 7 Sep 12

"by serfs" should read "as serfs'.

Jonah7 says...
5:49pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Personally I am delighted that these drivers and vehicles have been taken off the road. The inconvenience to law abiding drivers is minimal and worth it. How else do we stop these people from endangering the lives of others?

Geoff103 says...
6:31pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Firstly, Jonah7, there has to be a recognition that 100% adherence to the law is simply not attainable.

Attempting to screen the public in mass checks to find the few miscreants is a poor use of resources and is overbearing.

When it comes to vehicles and drivers without proper insurance, other countries already have an answer. Some demand the display of a 'Prufsticke' to show both a valid MOT and Insurance. Easily incorporated in the number plate for recognition by APNR, ideally placed at filling stations so that no Prufsticke, no fuel. Doesn't take long to take such a vehicle out of circulation.

And there's plenty more ideas out there to solve that issue.

And, secondly, just how is the illicit use of Red Diesel likely to endanger the lives of others?

As for the inconvenience being minimal, just wait until 'THEY' decide that checks on the validity of your credit cards or the cash in your wallet are required before you can do your shopping, or a whole host of other activities that can be subverted by law-breakers.

This is supposed to be a society where the burden of proof is required before an assumption of guilt.

These mass checks reverse that.

Ambience says...
7:09pm Fri 7 Sep 12

It might be interesting to know how much this whole operation cost the taxpayer.

Milkbutnosugarplease says...
9:49pm Fri 7 Sep 12

It might also be good to know what punishments are given to the offenders and, if a prison term, how long is actually spent in prison and, if a fine, whether the fine is actually paid. Without that knowledge in future, all we have is the police and other bodies using this newspaper to justify a fishing expedition with scope for good publicity.

lakesailor says...
11:51pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Milkbutnosugarplease wrote:
It might also be good to know what punishments are given to the offenders and, if a prison term, how long is actually spent in prison and, if a fine, whether the fine is actually paid. Without that knowledge in future, all we have is the police and other bodies using this newspaper to justify a fishing expedition with scope for good publicity.
Shoot them on the spot. That'd larn 'em.

Stargazeratdawn says...
8:40am Sun 9 Sep 12

'if you haven't or, aren't breaking the law, then there's nothing to worry about.' As far as inconvenience is concerned then try standing in traffic on the M4 every morning trying to get into central London,that's inconvenience! The worst we have is trying to reach Ambleside on a bank holiday! All those members of the public who complain that nothing is being done to combat crime in our county, then this is proof that ok, we have a long way to go, but at least some action is taking place. Perhaps the driver of one of the stopped cars who had no insurance might have continued and hit and killed one of your family members....? Let's applaud instead of kicking, as it seems to be the British way to do.

Lakeuk says...
9:34am Sun 9 Sep 12

Interesting, so they managed to catch a few people by plonking their camera connected to a database for dvla, mot, insurance etc... on the road side, something they do everyday, but on this occasion they call it an operation so they can shout about it. Easy job

Yet on red diesel with no intelligence and random stops they managed to catch zero people. Are the skills going to the dogs.

Here's a thought, connect SLDC's new car park machines to the same databases that APNR connects to. Tapping in your plate number gets you checked against the databases and if flagged you'll have a friendly bobby waiting at your car ready to fine you.

Geoff103 says...
9:48am Sun 9 Sep 12

Stargazeratdawn: "if you haven't or, aren't breaking the law, then there's nothing to worry about.' "

Better, if no law is being broken, then there's no need to look.

That's how it used to be before the snoopers and their lapdogs took over. And these mass 'crackdowns' began.

Remember Benjamin Franklin: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

oceancloud says...
10:08am Sun 9 Sep 12

It may be a different matter Geoff103 if you were involved in an accident with an uninsured driver! Why should the majority of the public have to pay fuel tax, vehicle tax and motor insurance whilst some toe rags try to get away with it?

Geoff103 says...
12:41pm Sun 9 Sep 12

"Why should the majority of the public have to pay fuel tax, vehicle tax and motor insurance whilst some toe rags try to get away with it?"

No reason at all.

Mass crackdowns that target hundreds of law-abiding people to find a few miscreants are not the way. Red Diesel - 150 stopped, nobody found to be using it illegally.

oceancloud says...
2:14pm Sun 9 Sep 12

In hindsight yes but but they wouldn't know till after they had done the checks.

Geoff103 says...
2:52pm Sun 9 Sep 12

What your suggesting and supporting is that we should all go though mandatory checks each time we step out of the house to 'prove' we are innocent of whatever offence the authorities are targetting that day.

If misuse of red diesel, for instance, is a problem, then change the tax regime, develop new methods of delivery, etc so that only those allowed to use it can buy it. There is absolutely no excuse for using the blunt instrument of mass checks of the innocent.

Next time you're on your way to an urgent appointment- a hospital check, a job interview or to catch a flight. Don't worry about being stopped at the roadside for 20 minutes and you miss your check-up, lose the job or miss the plane. It'll all be in a good cause of catching someone else with half a tank of illegitimate red diesel.

Stargazeratdawn says...
8:56am Mon 10 Sep 12

Geoff103, You make some sound points and some are worth consideration. However...l have a wife and four daughters. Lets look at a typical weekend night in Manchester..No, lets take Carlisle or Kendal...would I rather have cctv cameras watching over my wife and girls or none...? Its all down to 'what if?' and sure, I agree that we shouldn't live our lives in prediction of the worst about to happen..but, better safe than sorry.. I for one applaud what you call the 'snooper' culture..Crikey Geoff, what a small price to pay for just one rapist or aggressor brought to justice...

Geoff103 says...
9:04am Mon 10 Sep 12

Small price?

I refer you to Benjamin Franklin.

The price is far too high.

life cycle too says...
11:02am Wed 12 Sep 12

Stargazeratdawn, I have never been inconvenienced on the M4 - but why is THAT problem relevant to this recent action - do they check for red diesel on the M4 most days?

Your faith in the constant monitoring would soon be shaken if YOU were accused of something you had not done because somebody had cloned your vehicle registration, and you were faced with the job of proving you were innocent.

I was on holiday in France with my family when my wife's car was apparently seen speeding in Kendal.
You would think that informing the authorities of this would be an end to the process - but I was hounded for some time before the Chief Constable finally dropped the case!

I actually have little problem with this sort of action - the checking of insurance etc. is quick, and the inconvenience slight... but the government did introduce continuous insurance legislation that is supposed to do this without the need for such action!
As for red diesel, it is ONLY these checks that deters people from abusing the law, and cheating the revenue - previous operations HAVE shown up law breakers... but they are not THAT common as to be a problem to law abiding motorists.

HardJelly says...
4:13pm Fri 14 Sep 12

The main thing to remember is that unless you are actually committing an offence and placed under arrest then you don't have do anything the police instruct you to do - including giving your name or leaving the comfort of your vehicle!

Geoff103 says...
4:49pm Fri 14 Sep 12

HardJelly.

Best of luck with that approach. Don't come back whining, though, when you find yourself on the wrong end of an altered witness statement.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree