Hoteliers lash 'unfair' competition as Brockhole masterplan is unveiled (From The Westmorland Gazette)
When news happens, text KENEWS and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Hoteliers lash 'unfair' competition as Brockhole masterplan is unveiled
1:00pm Thursday 18th October 2012 in News
By Allan Tunningley
LAKES hoteliers have slammed national park plans which they claim would put Brockhole Visitor Centre in direct and ‘unfair’ competition with them.
They have joined a chorus of disapproval over a Lake District National Park Authority (LDNPA) ‘master plan’ for the centre.
The objectors fear the proposals add up to over-commercialisation of the publicly-owned house and gardens – once the home of Beatrix Potter’s cousins, the Gaddum family, and now the park authority’s main visitor centre in the Lake District.
Plans include:
* an indoor venue for weddings and other functions for up to 500;
* an ‘outdoor event’ space for up to 5,000;
* a watersports centre complete with a new lake and building for staff and equipment;
* a hostel for visitors; and
* a lakeside education classroom.
Jonathan Denby, president of the Lakes Hospitality Association, said: “These venues would put a subsidised Brockhole in direct competition with commercial organisations. It is a completely inap-propriate use of public money.
“The wedding venue in particular would have an unfair advantage over local hotels which have to make a profit to survive.”
Mr Denby, who runs South Lakes Hotels, said it was not the job of the LDNPA to run commercial activities in competition with local businesses and called for the authority to consider selling off Brockhole.
“It is being subsidised to the tune of £300,000 a year and more public money is being pumped in to pay for the redevelopment. It puts the centre at an unfair advantage.”
Thomas Noblett, who runs the Langdale Chase Hotel, claimed a wedding venue at Brockhole would end up ‘looting the business’ from other hotels.
“We have enough competition on the shore of Windermere already without adding another, especially created by public subsidy,” he said.
The hoteliers’ concerns echoed those of nearby residents who attended a LDNPA meeting to voice their concerns over the plan this week.
Ken Clarke, of Ecclerigg, told authority members he and his neighbours objected to a number of the proposals, especially the wedding venue, water-sports centre and hostel.
“The contentious proposals, if implemented, will be noisy, disturbing and have the potential to create increased trespass incidents,” said Mr Clarke.
Authority chairman William Jefferson said authority officials would meet residents to discuss their concerns.
This week's meeting was also addressed by campaigners fighting plans to fell a 110-year-old historic monkey puzzle tree and a number of memorial trees at Brockhole.
Wildlife artist Marianne Birkby described the felling plans as ‘an act of vandalism’ while horticultural expert Ben Andrews described the monkey puzzle as ‘a much-loved specimen’ and ‘probably the largest tree of its kind in Cumbria’.
Mr Jefferson said: “We are fully aware of the sensitivies surrounding these issues. Regeneration invariably attracts some controversy and there can rarely be unanimity. The important thing is to move forward with care and purpose in an open and transparent manner”
A spokesman for LDNPA said the future of the master plan would be decided at next month’s park authority meeting.
Comments(16)
Ben Berry
says...
1:29pm Thu 18 Oct 12
Very concerning
onelocal
says...
5:16pm Thu 18 Oct 12
I assume you are talking about the proposed SLDC owned and funded Marina at Ferry Nab, which will compete with commercial enterprises on the Lake. Plans are so secret that SLDC officer initially denied there was a business plan, and on being pushed, refused to share plans with the Lake User Forum back in March and again at their September meeting. Will be interesting to hear eventually how this commercial development is being funded and what impact a subsidized marina will have on commercial enterprises.
life cycle too
says...
7:27pm Thu 18 Oct 12
They took the money of relatives of people who had died, and wished to plant a tree in their memory - now they want to cut those trees down.
Since 1969 they have had responsibility for Brockhole, but only in 2012 do they decide that the monkey puzzle tree "was not liked by Thomas Mawson" and should be cut down after 110 years in place - planted there by the family who owned and built the house and grounds!
At the same meeting at which they refused a Zip Wire attraction at Honister Mines, they passed THREE of their own at Brockhole!
In their information centres (when they had many) they chose not to compete with local businesses, and tried to sell souvenirs at far higher prices than local shops - now they want to compete with local businesses in areas where they do not belong!
It is not that long ago that they objected to hotels around Brockhole having fireworks for wedding parties - I can see that fireworks will soon be on the list of attractions they offer there if their past history is anything to go by!
If they ran a used car business, they would have been featured on BBCs Watchdog program by now!
If they were a council or government party, they would have been voted out of office - but they are wholly unaccountable to anyone except themselves - and are prepared to sell themselves with no scruples in order to raise more money.
- YET they cut off the biggest stream of income - registering ski boats to appease their allies the Friends of the Lake District, rather than take the trouble to introduce a managed use policy.
It is starting to feel as though we live in a near bankrupt eastern European country, with a corrupt and inept government!
twitchy
says...
10:04pm Thu 18 Oct 12
Will his present company M2A get the contract for the development?
Is Brockhole in safe hands?
Keep the tree---fell the LDNPA.”
Moonbase
says...
7:54am Fri 19 Oct 12
life cycle too wrote:Well said......These old **** need to go, little Hi*lers in their own lunchtime!!!!
The devious manner in which the LDNPA change their policies to suit themselves shows that they cannot be trusted to look after the heritage of the National Park they are supposed to support and protect.
They took the money of relatives of people who had died, and wished to plant a tree in their memory - now they want to cut those trees down.
Since 1969 they have had responsibility for Brockhole, but only in 2012 do they decide that the monkey puzzle tree "was not liked by Thomas Mawson" and should be cut down after 110 years in place - planted there by the family who owned and built the house and grounds!
At the same meeting at which they refused a Zip Wire attraction at Honister Mines, they passed THREE of their own at Brockhole!
In their information centres (when they had many) they chose not to compete with local businesses, and tried to sell souvenirs at far higher prices than local shops - now they want to compete with local businesses in areas where they do not belong!
It is not that long ago that they objected to hotels around Brockhole having fireworks for wedding parties - I can see that fireworks will soon be on the list of attractions they offer there if their past history is anything to go by!
If they ran a used car business, they would have been featured on BBCs Watchdog program by now!
If they were a council or government party, they would have been voted out of office - but they are wholly unaccountable to anyone except themselves - and are prepared to sell themselves with no scruples in order to raise more money.
- YET they cut off the biggest stream of income - registering ski boats to appease their allies the Friends of the Lake District, rather than take the trouble to introduce a managed use policy.
It is starting to feel as though we live in a near bankrupt eastern European country, with a corrupt and inept government!
Bring back the speed boats and a bit of life to the Lakes.
zaney5
says...
10:07am Fri 19 Oct 12
zaney5
says...
10:08am Fri 19 Oct 12
slimjm
says...
6:32pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Lakeuk
says...
7:39pm Fri 19 Oct 12
craggy
says...
7:53pm Fri 19 Oct 12
Are we prepared to pay more for Brockhole?
What do we want?
twitchy
says...
8:35pm Fri 19 Oct 12
The best way forward would be for the LDNPA to sell Brockhole whilst it is still worth something--it has been in their disasterous hands for far too long.
life cycle too
says...
12:39am Sat 20 Oct 12
Lakeuk wrote:Competition from another business is one thing, if that business has to pay it's way, but if it receives a £300,000 subsidy from the tax payer, then the playing field becomes a little uneven!
What wrong with a little bit of competition?
If it is able to give itself planning permissions denied to others, then the whole situation becomes slightly perverse!
wezzyk
says...
11:37am Sat 20 Oct 12
Save the tree fell LDNPA
marianneb
says...
3:34pm Mon 22 Oct 12
There was a bat survey on the grove of oak trees mutilated for the Tree Top Trek - the survey said that under no circumstances should there be activity at dusk and night in order to give the bats some breathing space for foraging - lo and behold there are now Twilight Tree Top Treks with lights and shouting - Don't want to be a kill joy but the bats' experience of protection by the LDNP in their once tranquil grove of oak trees is far from good - and of course the LDNP cannot be held responsible as this is a private company who understandably want to claw back money .....and so it will go with the Master Plan if this obscene development is allowed to go ahead...the Monkey Puzzle is the central sacrifice.
Lakeuk
says...
11:47pm Wed 24 Oct 12
The expert doesn't find any evidence of bat roosts in the trees but expects the bats that roost in buildings on brockhole pass through the wood to feed on sites outside of brockhole.
The expert states that bats can tolloration alot of noise.
The expert recommends between March - November that courses are closed one hour before sunset for some quiet time for the bats, the planners have not made it conditional, it's just a recommendation. The bats won't be impacted
Ben Berry says...
1:29pm Thu 18 Oct 12
Very concerning