Hoteliers lash 'unfair' competition as Brockhole masterplan is unveiled

LAKES hoteliers have slammed national park plans which they claim would put Brockhole Visitor Centre in direct and ‘unfair’ competition with them.

They have joined a chorus of disapproval over a Lake District National Park Authority (LDNPA) ‘master plan’ for the centre.

The objectors fear the proposals add up to over-commercialisation of the publicly-owned house and gardens – once the home of Beatrix Potter’s cousins, the Gaddum family, and now the park authority’s main visitor centre in the Lake District.

Plans include:

* an indoor venue for weddings and other functions for up to 500;

* an ‘outdoor event’ space for up to 5,000;

* a watersports centre complete with a new lake and building for staff and equipment;

* a hostel for visitors; and

* a lakeside education classroom.

Jonathan Denby, president of the Lakes Hospitality Association, said: “These venues would put a subsidised Brockhole in direct competition with commercial organisations. It is a completely inap-propriate use of public money.

“The wedding venue in particular would have an unfair advantage over local hotels which have to make a profit to survive.”

Related links

Mr Denby, who runs South Lakes Hotels, said it was not the job of the LDNPA to run commercial activities in competition with local businesses and called for the authority to consider selling off Brockhole.

“It is being subsidised to the tune of £300,000 a year and more public money is being pumped in to pay for the redevelopment. It puts the centre at an unfair advantage.”

Thomas Noblett, who runs the Langdale Chase Hotel, claimed a wedding venue at Brockhole would end up ‘looting the business’ from other hotels.

“We have enough competition on the shore of Windermere already without adding another, especially created by public subsidy,” he said.

The hoteliers’ concerns echoed those of nearby residents who attended a LDNPA meeting to voice their concerns over the plan this week.

Ken Clarke, of Ecclerigg, told authority members he and his neighbours objected to a number of the proposals, especially the wedding venue, water-sports centre and hostel.

“The contentious proposals, if implemented, will be noisy, disturbing and have the potential to create increased trespass incidents,” said Mr Clarke.

Authority chairman William Jefferson said authority officials would meet residents to discuss their concerns.

This week's meeting was also addressed by campaigners fighting plans to fell a 110-year-old historic monkey puzzle tree and a number of memorial trees at Brockhole.

Wildlife artist Marianne Birkby described the felling plans as ‘an act of vandalism’ while horticultural expert Ben Andrews described the monkey puzzle as ‘a much-loved specimen’ and ‘probably the largest tree of its kind in Cumbria’.

Mr Jefferson said: “We are fully aware of the sensitivies surrounding these issues. Regeneration invariably attracts some controversy and there can rarely be unanimity. The important thing is to move forward with care and purpose in an open and transparent manner”

A spokesman for LDNPA said the future of the master plan would be decided at next month’s park authority meeting.

Comments(16)

Ben Berry says...
1:29pm Thu 18 Oct 12

This isn't the only local authority looking to have public sector subsidised enterprise.

Very concerning

Ben Berry says...
1:29pm Thu 18 Oct 12

This isn't the only local authority looking to have public sector subsidised enterprise.

Very concerning

onelocal says...
5:16pm Thu 18 Oct 12

You can say that again, Ben.
I assume you are talking about the proposed SLDC owned and funded Marina at Ferry Nab, which will compete with commercial enterprises on the Lake. Plans are so secret that SLDC officer initially denied there was a business plan, and on being pushed, refused to share plans with the Lake User Forum back in March and again at their September meeting. Will be interesting to hear eventually how this commercial development is being funded and what impact a subsidized marina will have on commercial enterprises.

life cycle too says...
7:27pm Thu 18 Oct 12

The devious manner in which the LDNPA change their policies to suit themselves shows that they cannot be trusted to look after the heritage of the National Park they are supposed to support and protect.

They took the money of relatives of people who had died, and wished to plant a tree in their memory - now they want to cut those trees down.

Since 1969 they have had responsibility for Brockhole, but only in 2012 do they decide that the monkey puzzle tree "was not liked by Thomas Mawson" and should be cut down after 110 years in place - planted there by the family who owned and built the house and grounds!

At the same meeting at which they refused a Zip Wire attraction at Honister Mines, they passed THREE of their own at Brockhole!

In their information centres (when they had many) they chose not to compete with local businesses, and tried to sell souvenirs at far higher prices than local shops - now they want to compete with local businesses in areas where they do not belong!

It is not that long ago that they objected to hotels around Brockhole having fireworks for wedding parties - I can see that fireworks will soon be on the list of attractions they offer there if their past history is anything to go by!

If they ran a used car business, they would have been featured on BBCs Watchdog program by now!
If they were a council or government party, they would have been voted out of office - but they are wholly unaccountable to anyone except themselves - and are prepared to sell themselves with no scruples in order to raise more money.

- YET they cut off the biggest stream of income - registering ski boats to appease their allies the Friends of the Lake District, rather than take the trouble to introduce a managed use policy.
It is starting to feel as though we live in a near bankrupt eastern European country, with a corrupt and inept government!

twitchy says...
10:04pm Thu 18 Oct 12

The whole financial set up of the LDNPA needs close scrutiny. How has the funding it has already received been spent? Who are they accountable to? Why do they have a development manager whose CV includes five liquidated companies with liabilities?
Will his present company M2A get the contract for the development?
Is Brockhole in safe hands?
Keep the tree---fell the LDNPA.”

Moonbase says...
7:54am Fri 19 Oct 12

life cycle too wrote:
The devious manner in which the LDNPA change their policies to suit themselves shows that they cannot be trusted to look after the heritage of the National Park they are supposed to support and protect.

They took the money of relatives of people who had died, and wished to plant a tree in their memory - now they want to cut those trees down.

Since 1969 they have had responsibility for Brockhole, but only in 2012 do they decide that the monkey puzzle tree "was not liked by Thomas Mawson" and should be cut down after 110 years in place - planted there by the family who owned and built the house and grounds!

At the same meeting at which they refused a Zip Wire attraction at Honister Mines, they passed THREE of their own at Brockhole!

In their information centres (when they had many) they chose not to compete with local businesses, and tried to sell souvenirs at far higher prices than local shops - now they want to compete with local businesses in areas where they do not belong!

It is not that long ago that they objected to hotels around Brockhole having fireworks for wedding parties - I can see that fireworks will soon be on the list of attractions they offer there if their past history is anything to go by!

If they ran a used car business, they would have been featured on BBCs Watchdog program by now!
If they were a council or government party, they would have been voted out of office - but they are wholly unaccountable to anyone except themselves - and are prepared to sell themselves with no scruples in order to raise more money.

- YET they cut off the biggest stream of income - registering ski boats to appease their allies the Friends of the Lake District, rather than take the trouble to introduce a managed use policy.
It is starting to feel as though we live in a near bankrupt eastern European country, with a corrupt and inept government!
Well said......These old **** need to go, little Hi*lers in their own lunchtime!!!!
Bring back the speed boats and a bit of life to the Lakes.

zaney5 says...
10:07am Fri 19 Oct 12

Personally I'd prefer to get married at Brockhole. In fact, thats why myself and my husband got married outside the county as we wanted a more alternative venue rather than the standard hotel offering that everyone seems to go for.

zaney5 says...
10:08am Fri 19 Oct 12

But only if they kept the monkey puzzle tree!!! ;-)

slimjm says...
6:32pm Fri 19 Oct 12

The LDNPA should be ashamed of themselves even thinking of this proposal. It will be interesting to hear from their sidekicks "The Friends of the Lake District" who openly opposed the recently approved development 1 mile away at the Low Wood.

Lakeuk says...
7:39pm Fri 19 Oct 12

What wrong with a little bit of competition?

craggy says...
7:53pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Do we want brockhole to close?

Are we prepared to pay more for Brockhole?

What do we want?

twitchy says...
8:35pm Fri 19 Oct 12

I think what we want is a centre that introduces its visitors to the wildlife,birdlife, flora and fauna of the lakes whilst promoting local and traditional crafts in a hands on way,some history would be nice,but overall the emphasis should be on its tranquility. The theme park the LDNPA want will not deliver this and lets drop the pretence that this is about restoring Mawsons garden-if any is restored it will be a token only.
The best way forward would be for the LDNPA to sell Brockhole whilst it is still worth something--it has been in their disasterous hands for far too long.

life cycle too says...
12:39am Sat 20 Oct 12

Lakeuk wrote:
What wrong with a little bit of competition?
Competition from another business is one thing, if that business has to pay it's way, but if it receives a £300,000 subsidy from the tax payer, then the playing field becomes a little uneven!

If it is able to give itself planning permissions denied to others, then the whole situation becomes slightly perverse!

wezzyk says...
11:37am Sat 20 Oct 12

Weddings etc should be free at Brockhole as we've already paid for it in taxes...

Save the tree fell LDNPA

marianneb says...
3:34pm Mon 22 Oct 12

In answer to a request for a bat survey on the tree - the National Park reply is that : the contractor will check for bats while felling the tree.

There was a bat survey on the grove of oak trees mutilated for the Tree Top Trek - the survey said that under no circumstances should there be activity at dusk and night in order to give the bats some breathing space for foraging - lo and behold there are now Twilight Tree Top Treks with lights and shouting - Don't want to be a kill joy but the bats' experience of protection by the LDNP in their once tranquil grove of oak trees is far from good - and of course the LDNP cannot be held responsible as this is a private company who understandably want to claw back money .....and so it will go with the Master Plan if this obscene development is allowed to go ahead...the Monkey Puzzle is the central sacrifice.

Lakeuk says...
11:47pm Wed 24 Oct 12

I've had a read through the bat survey and strangely what I read plainly in black & white doesn't match the previous comment.

The expert doesn't find any evidence of bat roosts in the trees but expects the bats that roost in buildings on brockhole pass through the wood to feed on sites outside of brockhole.

The expert states that bats can tolloration alot of noise.

The expert recommends between March - November that courses are closed one hour before sunset for some quiet time for the bats, the planners have not made it conditional, it's just a recommendation. The bats won't be impacted

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree