Letter: Footpaths can reduce levels of town traffic

The reaction to the enhancement work on Highgate at Kendal over the last few weeks has been, unsurprisingly, hostile.

I have no axe to grind regarding the work itself, but it appears to me the existing concrete sets and flags were fine, and there was no need to replace them.

To me the expense was totally unjustified and is unlikely to generate the extra income required for the businesses in that area, or Kendal as a whole, to make it worthwhile.

However, I do whole-heartedly agree with the policy of enhancing and upgrading footways where they are used and needed for travel into and around town.

And this is where I am mystified by the unwillin-gness - or perhaps the inability - of our local councils to spend such time and money on the town's many peripheral footpaths.

Specifically I cite the one which enables me and other people living in the Castle Estate, Heron Hill and Sedbergh Road areas to walk around the Castle into town. That was improved many years ago with a limestone dust surface, but since then it appears to have been totally neglected and sometimes it becomes impassable due to floodwater, leaf mould and mud.

Others, such as the one along the old canal, are also poorly maintained and neglected.

I believe these footpaths are vital to the reduction of vehicle numbers in town and the amount of parking space needed for workers and visitors alike.

Many people, I believe, would walk or cycle to work and the shops if they knew they could do so without having to don walking boots or Wellingtons.

Surfaces need to be strengthened, drainage improved and, most importantly of all, they need to be cleaned and maintained regularly.

And to make things even better, especially now as the nights lengthen, I would suggest good lighting should be installed where it doesn't already exist.

Had we diverted the money spent on the Highgate enhancements and the new parking machines into these footpaths we could have made a difference to our environment. But, alas, once more, it's too late.

David C. Smith, Kendal

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:33pm Sun 4 Nov 12

BillP says...

No public toilets, but a new pavements!! There is something seriously wrong here.
SLDC are a law unto themslves.
No public toilets, but a new pavements!! There is something seriously wrong here. SLDC are a law unto themslves. BillP
  • Score: 0

1:00pm Tue 6 Nov 12

endada2 says...

Actually, a handful of councillors sit on or chair most committees and make decisions they think will get them votes. SLDC is not interested in people, only in self-interest i.e getting re elected. Megalomaniacs the lot of them. There is something like 52 councillors elected onto SLDC and only about 6 of them make real decisions and then only what 'officers' tell them what to do. SLDC is a waste of a vote and a waste of time and money.
Actually, a handful of councillors sit on or chair most committees and make decisions they think will get them votes. SLDC is not interested in people, only in self-interest i.e getting re elected. Megalomaniacs the lot of them. There is something like 52 councillors elected onto SLDC and only about 6 of them make real decisions and then only what 'officers' tell them what to do. SLDC is a waste of a vote and a waste of time and money. endada2
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree