Report this comment
  • "Many thanks to Allan Tunningley for exposing the rottenness at the heart of the National Park Authority. The heartwood of the Monkey Puzzle was strong and full of spirit."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

Felling of the monkey puzzle tree raises questions

First published in Opinion The Westmorland Gazette: Photograph of the Author by

THE sheer bloody-mindedness of the Lake District National Park Authority’s decision to axe the Brockhole monkey puzzle tree has astounded me.

I believe that to push ahead with the felling was an act of ecological and cultural vandalism.

No wonder campaigners fighting to save the 110-year-old tree ended up in tears.

In my view, the national park leadership should hang their collective heads in shame.

What, I ask, is a national park supposed to be for?

I thought it was about protecting the landscape - both natural and cultivated, as in the case of Brockhole’s garden.

National park authorities should certainly not be in the business of developing theme park-style visitor attractions in direct competition with private businesses. This is what appears to be happening at Brockhole with its tree-top walk and new jetty and plans for a zip wire, watersports centre and wedding and concert venue.

It would have been much better for the LDNPA to sell off Brockhole and use the money to preserve the Lakeland landscape and its iconic settlements. Instead, a lot of public money is being poured into the place at a time when public institutions and organisations are supposed to be tightening their belts.

What I find amazing is that the authority was able to grant itself planning permission for the work at Brockhole.

I can imagine what the LDNPA would have said if a private business wanted to introduce such attractions on the shores of Windermere.

You only need to recall the failure of the Honister Slate Mine zip wire bid to get an idea of what I mean.

It’s a point which raises fundamental issues about whether park authorities should be allowed to grant its own planning approvals, especially such contentious ones.

I believe it’s also legitimate to question why the authority was allowed to be judge, jury and executioner in the case of the now lost monkey puzzle tree.

Comments (14)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree