Timeline of allegations about BBC presenter

However, the young person at the centre of the controversy said nothing inappropriate or unlawful happened.

Here is the BBC’s account of how events unfolded:

– May 18

The complainant, a family member, attended a BBC building, where they sought to make a complaint about the behaviour of a BBC presenter.

– May 19

The complainant contacted BBC Audience Services and the details of this contact were referred to the BBC’s Corporate Investigations Team.

The BBC’s Corporate Investigations Team assessed the information contained in the complaint provided from Audience Services.

The assessment made was that on the basis of the information provided it did not include an allegation of criminality, but nonetheless merited further investigation.

The BBC’s Corporate Investigations Team emailed the complainant stating how seriously the BBC takes the issue and seeking additional information to verify the claims being made; there was no response to this contact.

Checks were also made to verify the identity of the complainant. The BBC said this is a standard procedure to confirm that the complainant is the person they say they are.

Appearing on BBC Radio 4’s World At One programme with broadcaster Sarah Montague, director-general Tim Davie spoke about the initial complaint made to the corporation about one of its presenters.

He said: “The facts are there that very simply the Corporate Investigations Team looked at the log – that is the summary of the call – we have clear records of an interaction that lasted 29 minutes.”

– June 6

Having received no response to the email referenced above, a phone call was made to the mobile number provided by the complainant by the BBC’s Corporate Investigations Team; the call did not connect.

Following these attempts to make contact with the complainant, the Corporate Investigations Team were due to return to the matter in the coming weeks.

No additional attempts to contact the complainant were made after June 6, however the case remained open throughout.

– July 6

The Sun newspaper informed the BBC via the Corporate Press Office of allegations concerning a BBC presenter.

The BBC said it became clear that the source of the claims was from the same family as approached the BBC on May 18 and May 19.

This was the first time that the director-general or any executive directors at the BBC were aware of the case.

The claims made by The Sun contained new allegations, that were different to the matters being considered by BBC Corporate Investigations.

When asked about the difference between the complaint on May 19 and the complaint made in The Sun story, Mr Davie said: “The process is that we did receive a call as you can see in the timeline on May 19 that was taken by Audience Services Team who then make a summary of the call and put it to our highly experienced Corporate Investigations team.

“On the basis of the information they had at that point, it did not include an allegation of criminality, but nonetheless was very serious and they wanted to follow it up, and you can see the attempts to follow it up on the timeline.

“It was serious but the key was their assessment was it did not include an allegation of criminality.

“When The Sun made new allegations on July 6 they were different to the matters considered by BBC Corporate Investigations and those new allegations clearly related to potential criminal activity, criminality, that in a nutshell is the difference.”

The BBC initiated an incident management group to lead the response to this case, involving senior BBC executives including the director-general.

The acting chairman was updated, and the board was regularly updated in the coming days.

A senior manager held the first conversation on this matter with the presenter concerned, to make him aware of the claims being outlined by The Sun.

It was agreed that the presenter would not be on air while this matter was being considered.

Mr Davie also told the World At One he did not speak to the accused presenter on July 6, but instead the conversation was conducted by a “senior manager”, which the director-general said was important in order for him to be able to oversee the process.

– July 7

Following The Sun’s contact, the BBC’s Corporate Investigations team contacted the complainant again, who was in touch with the BBC’s investigators.

The BBC’s Serious Case Management Framework (SCMF) was initiated and the investigation being undertaken by the Corporate Investigations Team was brought into the SCMF, which is chaired by a human resources director.

The BBC also made contact with the police with regard to this matter.

– July 8

The complainant sent the BBC some materials related to the complaint.

– July 9

The complainant continued to send the BBC materials to do with the complaint.

The BBC issued an update to staff and the media. The broadcaster also confirmed that it had suspended the presenter.

– July 10

The BBC met with the police to report the matter and discuss how to progress the investigation.

The police have requested that the BBC pause its investigations into the allegations while they scope future work.

– July 11

The BBC reported a second person felt threatened by messages they received from the presenter.

According to the BBC, the person in their early 20s met the presenter on a dating app before their conversations moved to other platforms.

The presenter then revealed his identity and asked the young person not to tell anyone.

The young person later posted online alluding to having had contact with a BBC presenter and hinting they might name him.

The presenter then sent a number of “threatening messages” which the BBC says it has seen and confirmed came from a phone number belonging to the presenter.

The BBC said the young person felt “threatened” by the messages and “remains scared”.

BBC News said it had contacted the presenter via his lawyer but had received no response to the allegations.