Public divided over plan for new Sainsbury's store at Ambleside

A STEADY stream of curious residents have been scrutinising plans for a new multi-million pound Sainsbury’s supermarket in Ambleside.

Developers, architects and the company’s public relations representatives manned the stands at two exhibition days at the weekend.

Display boards at the town’s Parish Church Centre showed how the 14,000ft2 food store – planned for land next to Hayes Garden World – could look. The firm says the scheme could create 100 new jobs and is determined the public have their say first.

Andrew Sanderson, of Sainsbury’s, said turnout was ‘excellent’ despite the hot weather and the feedback was ‘very useful’.

Mr Sanderson added: “Feedback forms will now be distributed throughout Ambleside so that anyone unable to attend last week’s events can have their say. We will consider all the comments we receive in the coming weeks and take into account wherever possible the suggestions of the local community.”

An application to the Lake District National Park Authority is likely later in the year.

One resident taking a look on Saturday was Judy Shaw, of Hawkshead, who said: “They seem to have gone for the cheapest, lowest common denominator building. “I think it’s awful – stone and wood that won’t look good in five years if it’s not maintained. I would like them to do something that reflects the architecture of the area, that looks local and doesn’t look like any other Sainsbury’s anywhere else.”

But David Crouchley, of Windermere, said: “I’m generally in favour. I think it would be good for there to be a one-stop shop in Ambleside. “It’s important the building fits in with local architectural style.

“The concern I have is about the detrimental effect a store like this could have on local shopkeepers. But having lived in Penrith, where Cranstons built a store which incorporated local fishmongers and butchers, there are models where local traders can thrive alongside supermarkets.”

The store – which will not have a garage or cafe – is smaller than Sainsbury’s usual developments and about a third the size of Hayes, say the company, who added it would mean ‘more choice, competition and variety’ for Ambleside’s food offer.

It also says it would cut the ‘time taken and distance travelled’ for residents to do their weekly shop – helping the environment. Many in the town are backing the store but the Federation for Small Businesses in Cumbria has reservations.

Gary Lovatt, its regional chairman, said Ambleside was unlike many places around the country in not being a ‘clone town’.

“We should be celebrating and building on that instead of trying to attract these national chains which will tear into the fabric of the area. “The job creation figures will likely prove inaccurate once we actually see job losses caused by smaller traders forced to lay off staff or close.

“Our research shows that money spent with small businesses locally tends to be re-spent in the local economy, whereas profits made by large businesses are more likely to go out of an area and redistributed to shareholders.”

Further information is available online at www.sainsburys-ambleside.co.uk or by calling 0800 319 6162.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:06am Thu 18 Jul 13

Ambience says...

Local people in this report have said they want a building which reflects the 'architecture of the area' or 'local architectural style'. Looking at the Hayes Garden World building it's difficult to pinpoint which architectural style they should go for.
Local people in this report have said they want a building which reflects the 'architecture of the area' or 'local architectural style'. Looking at the Hayes Garden World building it's difficult to pinpoint which architectural style they should go for. Ambience
  • Score: 0

5:53pm Thu 18 Jul 13

jazzactivist says...

I agree with Gary Lovett - there's no need for it. The location would be more usefully used to build affordable housing - something that is desperately needed in Ambleside.
I agree with Gary Lovett - there's no need for it. The location would be more usefully used to build affordable housing - something that is desperately needed in Ambleside. jazzactivist
  • Score: 0

6:16pm Fri 19 Jul 13

laker1 says...

jazzactivist wrote:
I agree with Gary Lovett - there's no need for it. The location would be more usefully used to build affordable housing - something that is desperately needed in Ambleside.
Oh God he's at it again - you do not live in Ambleside - therefore mind your own business - bring it on
[quote][p][bold]jazzactivist[/bold] wrote: I agree with Gary Lovett - there's no need for it. The location would be more usefully used to build affordable housing - something that is desperately needed in Ambleside.[/p][/quote]Oh God he's at it again - you do not live in Ambleside - therefore mind your own business - bring it on laker1
  • Score: 0

9:18pm Sat 20 Jul 13

jazzactivist says...

I could say about you "she's at it again". It doesn't matter whether I live in Ambleside, or not. I still have the same right as anyone else to comment on local development that I think is unreasonable and ill thought out. In fact, my partner works near there so quite often stops off on his way to / from work to buy items we need, and he won't be shopping at Sainsbury's, if it gets built. Ambleside is also only 30 mins drive from where I live, as it is from most locations in the South Lakes, so close enough for it to matter to me and lots of other people round about.

House prices there are desperately high - too high for local working people to afford. So if the choice was between a supermarket or affordable housing I would imagine that housing is more important as there isn't any of that, whereas there are plenty of places to shop.
I could say about you "she's at it again". It doesn't matter whether I live in Ambleside, or not. I still have the same right as anyone else to comment on local development that I think is unreasonable and ill thought out. In fact, my partner works near there so quite often stops off on his way to / from work to buy items we need, and he won't be shopping at Sainsbury's, if it gets built. Ambleside is also only 30 mins drive from where I live, as it is from most locations in the South Lakes, so close enough for it to matter to me and lots of other people round about. House prices there are desperately high - too high for local working people to afford. So if the choice was between a supermarket or affordable housing I would imagine that housing is more important as there isn't any of that, whereas there are plenty of places to shop. jazzactivist
  • Score: 0

10:07pm Sun 21 Jul 13

zaney5 says...

There are plenty of houses. Unfortunately they are all being used either as second homes or as holiday lets. I'm more disgusted at the number of holiday rental businesses that keep opening up than a supermarket.
There are plenty of houses. Unfortunately they are all being used either as second homes or as holiday lets. I'm more disgusted at the number of holiday rental businesses that keep opening up than a supermarket. zaney5
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree